ANKASecure© centralizes cryptographic decisions in a three-layer policy engine — algorithm availability, key rotation and key lifecycle — defined per deployment and overridable per tenant, with 29 policy templates aligned with NIST, NSA CNSA 2.0, BSI, ANSSI, ETSI and CRYPTREC among others. Every key generation, rotation and cryptographic operation is checked against the active policy before it runs and refused with a reason when it violates it; a policy change propagates to every service instance in under a second. Authority over operations is modelled as revocable capability grants with constraint policies on a platform/tenant/operator role model. Each operation is recorded with its policy decision in a signed, tamper-evident audit trail, queryable per tenant and forwardable to a SIEM with the signature preserved, and the console computes five posture measurements from the live estate. Discovery and inventory are delivered by ANKATech channel partners.

Nobody can say which algorithms protect your data. One place can.

The decision lives in every team’s code: which cipher, which key length, which library, which mode. ANKASecure© takes that decision out of the applications, makes it once, enforces it before every operation, and keeps the evidence that it applied.

CISOHead of security architectureGRC lead

Is this you

Three ways this lands on your desk

An audit finding with no owner

“Which algorithms are in use, where, and who approved them?” The honest answer is a spreadsheet three people maintain, and it was wrong the day it was finished.

Shadow cryptography

Every team picks its own library, parameters and key handling. The standard exists; nothing enforces it, so each release is a new place for it to drift.

A policy that lives on paper

The board adopted a cryptographic standard. No system in the estate can refuse an operation that violates it, so compliance is a matter of trust and a yearly review.

Who signs this: A CISO or head of security architecture who is accountable for a standard they cannot enforce, and a GRC lead who has to evidence it. If the answer to “which policy applied to this operation?” is a meeting, this is the conversation.

How it works

Four moves, none of them a rewrite

Applications keep referencing a key identifier and calling the same operation. ANKASecure© decides what that means, checks it, and writes down that it did.

  1. One policy engine, three layers

    Algorithm availability, key rotation and key lifecycle are three policies, defined once for the deployment and overridable per tenant. A template names the standard — NIST, NSA CNSA 2.0, BSI, ANSSI, ETSI, CRYPTREC and more — or a custom policy names your own.

  2. Enforcement before the operation, not after

    Key generation, rotation and every cryptographic operation are checked against the active policy before they run. A violation is refused with the reason, not logged and allowed. A policy change reaches every service instance in under a second.

    • algorithm availability
    • rotation
    • lifecycle
    • < 1 s propagation
  3. Authority is explicit

    Who may exercise which operation, on which keys, under which constraints, until when — ANKASecure© models that as capability grants with constraint policies, on a role model that separates platform, tenant and operator authority. A grant can be revoked without touching the data it governed.

  4. Every decision leaves evidence

    Each operation is recorded with the policy decision beside it, signed, in a tamper-evident chain. The trail is queryable per tenant and forwards to your SIEM with the signature intact, so an auditor verifies it without trusting the forwarding step.

    • signed audit trail
    • hash chain
    • SIEM forwarding

Control means the measurement is defined

Four pillars, and each one states what it measures, what it deliberately does not, the threshold it passes at, and the action that would close it. Conformance is judged against each tenant’s own declared policy — never against an external bar — and a tenant that declares no policy is counted as unmeasured rather than quietly passed.

ANKASecure© · Sovereignty · healthy
The Sovereignty pillar: the key-protection backend is declared, bound and provisioned, so the custody root is under the customer’s control. The card states that this is a configuration state and not a liveness check.
Real deployment · non-production data.
ANKASecure© · Modernization · healthy
The Modernization pillar at 48 per cent modernized, with the note that the status reflects rotation-target capability rather than raw progress, so legacy migration debt alone never fails the pillar. Green at 95 per cent, amber at 80.
Real deployment · non-production data.
ANKASecure© · Policy governance · critical
The Policy Governance pillar in critical: two of twenty-two tenants govern deliberately, broken down by template dimension, with green requiring 100 per cent and the recommended action to assign an explicit template to the rest.
Real deployment · non-production data.
ANKASecure© · Conformance · critical
The Conformance pillar in critical: twenty-one of forty-nine governed keys conform, judged against each tenant’s own declared policy rather than an external threshold, with twenty-one tenants unmeasured because they declared none.
Real deployment · non-production data.

Fifteen minutes

What you will actually watch

Live, on a real deployment, on the kind of estate you have. Nothing in this list is a mock-up or a roadmap item.

  1. The posture view: five measurements across the estate — agility, sovereignty, modernization, governance, conformance — computed from live keys and policies.

  2. A tenant running on the deployment default. A standard’s template is applied to it; the change is visible on every service in under a second.

  3. An application asks for a key the policy no longer allows. The request is refused, with the reason the auditor will want to read.

  4. A constrained capability is granted to a counterparty, exercised once, and revoked. The data it governed is untouched.

  5. The audit trail is queried: which policy applied to which operation, signed, in a chain that would show any edit.

  6. Your audit finding, answered on the deployment rather than on a slide.

What it rests on

The capabilities underneath, with their state

  • Shipping

    Three-layer policy engine

    Algorithm availability, rotation and lifecycle policies; deployment-wide with per-tenant override; propagation in under a second.

  • Shipping

    29 policy templates

    29 of them algorithm-availability templates, and 24 of those tied to a named standard or jurisdiction.

  • Shipping

    Capability grants and constraint policies

    Explicit, revocable authority over cryptographic operations, on a role model that separates platform, tenant and operator.

  • Shipping

    Signed audit trail

    Tamper-evident chain with the policy decision recorded per operation; queryable per tenant; forwardable to your SIEM with the signature preserved.

  • Shipping

    Posture measurement

    Five measurements computed from the live estate in the console, with the provenance of each number.

  • Per channel

    Discovery and inventory

    What your estate uses today, delivered by ANKATech channel partners. Discovery produces visibility; the control plane produces control.

All of the platform →

The framework

Where this sits in CAPA

The Cryptographic Control Plane reference architecture describes each pillar through the scenarios it must handle and one practical test. This solution is the governance pillar’s own definition, and it is measured against its test.

04

Primary pillar

Cryptographic Governance & Compliance

Scenario realised

Enforcing a new enterprise security requirement

Practical test

“Can the organization prove, by querying the control plane, which policy applied to a given operation, and change that policy centrally?”

01

Primary pillar

Crypto-Agility

Scenario realised

Evolving cryptographic strategy without an application release

Practical test

“Can the cryptographic strategy change without requiring an application change or release?”

02

Supporting pillar

Cryptographic Sovereignty

Scenario realised

Maintaining revocable cryptographic authority over third parties

Practical test

“Can the organization govern policy across all its trust domains without moving keys, and revoke a third party’s cryptographic authority without re-encrypting the data?”

L2L3–L5

Maturity move

From a KMS and partial inventory with no policy governance to a Control Plane that enforces the standard on every governed application. Level 3 is the plane in place; levels 4 and 5 are the estate coming under it, application by application.

The six maturity levels →Reference architecture: cryptographiccontrolplane.org

What this does not do

  • It does not inventory your estate. Finding where cryptography is used today is a discovery engagement, and ANKATech partners run it.

  • It does not govern cryptography that never reaches the plane. A library call inside application code that does not delegate the operation is invisible to policy until that application is brought under it.

  • It does not certify you. ANKASecure© maps its controls to NIST CSWP 39, the GSA PQC Buyer’s Guide and OWASP and hands you the evidence; the determination is still your auditor’s.

Bring the audit finding.

The one nobody could answer. Fifteen minutes on a live deployment to show the policy that answers it, and the evidence behind it.

Book the demo